Fashion source technical design pdf

The structure gives the appearance of one single continuity of just one floor, one internal wall and one external wall. Materials: The building materials used in the construction of this magnificient structure is precast concrete blocks painted with white paints which is applied on both internal and external walls. Fig 7: Guggenheim Museum by Frank L. It is glaring that the designer and artist was trying to design something outrageous which came out looking like a Guggenheim but in this case the top of the hat grows downward creating various volumes as it grows.

This volume creates spaces of unique forms that is spacious. It is safe to assume that the materiality of the hat is made from a flexible material which allows it to take the form and geometry of the Guggenheim. The different curves of the hat are flattened into the fabric material thereby creating a three dimension of the hat.

This reverse concept of the building shows that the influence architecture has on fashion can be expressed in various ways with altered materials. The hat was made in The Balenciaga hat is made of silk material which makes the structure not to be balanced on its own when placed on the head, hence three internal hair combs acts as the framework of the hat that supports the hat on the head.

The geometry of the hat is very striking whereby the structure of the hat curves continuously leaving a few spaces as it grows and widens.

These spaces could act as a circulation space in terms of architectural design while the spiral form could serve as both the internal and external walls of the structure. It is my assumptions therefore that sometimes consciously or unconsciously fashion designers take clues from existing architectural buildings. It is safe to assume that the designer was trying to replicate the inverted cone form of the Guggenheim.

The materiality of the hat is also unknown but it is safe to assume that it is made of a solid material which allows the hat to balance on the head easily also, the hat looks like it is made of a white fabric which gives it the Guggenheim appearance. This hat is so unique because it was made out of felt and wheat straw plaits sewn by a special machine. The hat is unbalanced which makes the structural frame of the hat to be supported by the silk ribbon ties around the face of the wearer.

The shape of the hat looks like a building form aside the fact that it was influenced by the Guggenheim museum. The felt used in the production of the hat creates the various spaces as seen in the figure, also it depicts the shadow gap of the museum; The felt determines the width of each wrap as the machine weaves the straw round the felt to create the internal and external wall of the hat which acts as the body of the hat.

Therefore from my observation it is safe to assume that no matter the link between fashion and architecture, there would always be a certain influence from both worlds where each architect and designer wants to improve in their creativity at the same time provides a shelter and accessory for the body giving them that unique identity they deserve.

Through this case study what is coming clear is this kind of connection: the concept of art and the concept of technology. The Guggenheim building is the art of the mix and it defines fashion in a way that speaks art hence, the gimmick from various fashion designers. This influence that the Guggenheim building has on fashion could be said to be a formal influence because fashion is art and therefore the building represents fashion because it is an art piece on its own.

The concept of technology which is a physical object could also be seen in the building materiality used by the architect and that of the fashion designers, this technology allows the users of the buildings to feel, touch and see the object. The materiality used in the Guggenheim building I believe was difficult for the fashion designers to imitate and as a result they went for an alternative material that could still give the exact feel and texture as that of the Guggenheim building.

These influence that architecture has on fashion is an informal influence because there is no direct link with the materiality. Therefore the connection between both fields is that they both share the same concept but interpreted in different ways and with different technologies.

This could still be considered as an art because in art different materials could still give the same end product as seen in the images above. The nature of the material is permanent in architecture but in fashion it is transient. This gives fashion an upper hand compared to architecture. Also, the concept of technology has and is still having a great impact on the type of structures seen in both architecture and fashion.

Some of the new techniques used are known as spiral, folds, twist and waves. Quinn As seen in the images above. In some part of the world, some buildings still depicts modern architecture because of its style, taste and fashion. This influence could be said to be fashion because it reflects the fashion of the past in comparison to the fashion of the present. Therefore the connection between fashion and architecture could be said to be a parallel relationship which is inclined to continuous changes in style and fashion.

In conclusion, it is safe to agree that fashion design is all about movement and style, whereby the dresses are not constructed as a separate object from the movement rather they are seen as a single act.

Therefore it is safe to assume that the great transformation and changes taking place between fashion and architecture is as a result of the industrial revolution. Architecture under the influence of fashion design is becoming more fluid and artistic; on the other hand, fashion design under the influence of architecture is becoming more technical and structural.

After all said and done, the argument remains are these professions work in the benefit of the users and are they satisfying the human beings needs? Or are they just satisfying the aesthetical point of view of people.

She got her degree from Architectural Association, London in She began her trademark of neo modernist architecture when she was still teaching at Architectural Association Design Museum, She broke away from the classical rules of modernism such as space, ceilings walls, back, front and right angles then reconstructs them in her idea of a new fluid spatiality which is intended to symbolize the exciting fluidity of present-day life.

She combines light, fluidity and space in her building and fashion projects. Amongst both disciplines there is a clear understanding of how it begins and where it ends which begins from the human body then to generating spaces and finally to movement without any cautious act of a specific theory. Zaha Hadid lets her spaces which are fluid in nature speak for themselves. Although many people do not agree with her style of design, they believed the designs cannot be built but fortunately she has grown steadly to earn a reputation for herself in this profession with her unique forms in architecture and in fashion as well, which gives an expression of cultural and political identity and individuality.

This building comprising of a museum, auditoriums, conference room and library built by Zaha is located in Germany. It was constructed in the year The building is a work of art and from a distance it appears to be sculptured despite the fact that it is meant for the cultural appreciation of the metropolitan life on the caspian sea.

From the building shape, form and structure, it is obvious that the style of the building has bits of fashion. Spaces: The building spaces generates from the fluid form of the curved arc of the structure. Structure: The structure is of a curve arc form which was formed by basic nature forces such as the forces of ice, water and wind. The building structure reacts to the serviceable interactions and administrative structures within different sectors.

The folds of the structure gives the appearance of a single continuous surface. Materials: The building material used in the construction of this magnificient structure is steel. The building image above was inspired by the flowing mesh dress from her fashion playbook called frozen aura and it was because she wanted to help raise money for a foundation known as the world wildlife foundation. The dress was her muse for the famous ThyssenKrupp building.

The nature of the fabric allows light to pass through it thus making it very transparent to the public eyes. The fluidity nature of the dress can be seen in the form of the structure and also the way the buildings are arranged to one another. Therefore it is safe to assume that both architecture and fashion are more than connections.

They both involve filling empty spaces with planes and contours on different scales. However, the cross pollination of ideas is deliberate. The relationship between these two disciplines grows more intimate as the days goes by. The rubber shoes which are unusual in design are also very interesting to look at from a visual perspective. Thus, the cut outs of the shoes act as the window openings of the structure which allows light to enter the building.

The straps of the shoes divide the glass surface thereby acting as non-structural elements which does not reveal the whole space to the public but allows the users and viewers to experience the space themselves. The fluid nature of the shoes is visible in the building form and spaces created by the form. These shows that designers working in fashion as well as architecture tend to inspire one another in ways that are visible to the public and users.

Although both architecture and fashion are structured,visual and art in appearance. They are also three - dimensional in form and space which changes the entire shape of the design and also acts as the foundation for both architecture and most fashion designed objects.

In cases where we have the fashion designers as architects, it is safe to assume that a parallel relationship is created in their design which tends to bridge the gap of both fields. Thus, in cases where the fashion designers are not architects and the architects are not fashion designers, it is safe to assume that there is a similarity in their works influenced by the other.

It is also safe to assume that architecture inspired by fashion design is becoming more fluid and artistic while on the other hand, fashion design inspired by architecture is becoming more technical and structural. This research on the connection of both worlds has shown that there might be some possibility in the future in this new method of design. Postmodernism: Style and Subversion Postmodernism: The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. The Guggenheim: Frank Lloyd Wright and the making of the modern museum.

Publisher: Guggenheim publications. Barzandeh, M. Fashion, architecture and the urban environment. New Zealand: Unitec New Zealand. Brent C. The Failure of Modern Architecture. London: Studio Vista. Cathleen McGuigan. A Maverick Master. Newsweek 17,June. Cambridge University Press Castle M. Pawley H. Fashion and Architecture. Architectural Design.

Crouch, C. Modernism in Art, Design and Architecture. New York: St. Martins Press. Derek Thomas. Architecture and the Urban Environment. Publisher: Architectural Press, pg. Esther da Costa Meyer. Frank Gehry on Line. Gelernter, M. Sources of architectural form. Manchester: Manchester University Press.

Cognition and process vs design artifact in fashion design pedagogy. RMIT university. Swinburne University of Technology. Hotel Josef. Harvey D.

The Condition of Postmodernity. Oxford: Blackwell. Hodge B. Jacques D. Acts of Literature. Publisher: New York Times. Jencks Charles. What is Post-Modernism?. London: Academy Editions 4. The new paradigm in architecture: The language of post-modernism. Publishers: Yale University Press. Kostof S. The Architect, Chapter in the History of the Profession. New York: Oxford University Press. Lonely Planet. Loschek I. New York: Berg. Mark Wigley. Cambridge: MIT Press Miles G. London: Somerset House.

Mcleod M. New York: Princeton Architectural Press. Nicholas Royle. London: Palgrave Macmillan. Nicholai Ouroussoff. Published 22nd March. Norberg Schulz, C. Architecture: Presence, Language, Place.

Milan: Skira. Norberg-Schulz, C. Intention in architecture. Cambridge: MIT Press. Neil Levine. The Architecture of Frank Lloyd Wright. Princeton University Press Pugh G. Elevation: An Epic Fashion Collaboration. Architecture: The Frank Gehry Experience. Time Magazine, June 26th. Frank Gehry. Time Magazine, 26 thApril. April 20, Sue Jenkyn Jones. Fashion designs. Publisher: Laurence king publishing, pg. The Fashion of Architecture.

Oxford: Berg Publishers. Quinn B. Textile Futures: Fashion, design and Technology. Oxford: Berg Publishers Sarup, M. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press. Sustainable Development Research Institute, Trefil J. Houghton Mifflin Harcourt. Boston Vidal Valqui R. The art and science of problem solving informatics and mathematical modelling.

Complexity and Contradiction in Architecture. New York Ward G. Teach Yourself Postmodernism. London: Hodder Headline Plc. Intersections of art, science and technology. MIT Press. London Weston R. London: Phaidon Press Ltd. They create technical pack, also known as Tech Pack with every detail needed for the production of the garment. They also examine production samples and notes any deviation of the design from the finish product.

A technical designer must have a keen eye for fashion with pattern-making and fabrication skills, and be able to work closely with designers, manufacturers and merchandisers to create a high quality product. Taught by instructors with many years of experience as working as fashion and technical designers. Translate designer illustrations to hand drawn and digital fashion flats with design details.

Create patterns and construct the garment, emphasizing on fit. Keen knowledge of fabrics and their properties, including thread count, and shrinkage. Measure garment for size grading in different international sizing standards.