Microsoft expression web vs dreamweaver

Expression looks and feels very much like using Microsoft word, right down to the red squiggly underlines beneath coding errors, much like how Word points out spelling errors. Dreamweaver, on the other hand, has a more complicated, feature-packed interface that hold greater appeal for experienced web developers. Both programs handle Cascading Style Sheets CSS extremely well, automatically generating and displaying it accurately.

Again, Expression is slightly better in this area, displaying CSS code more precisely. When it comes to client-side scripting, it is difficult to see which software is better. They do different things, but both do it extremely well. Expressions strengths and weaknesses are almost the exact opposite.

It provides the finest support got AJAX… but little else. Dreamweaver generally wins in this category. I would find it frustrating if I had to use both products side-by-side, but someone using only DW would quickly adapt to its style. I'll get some hoots for such an admission, especially given that I build sites based on server-side scripting. Even with that, some kind of template system is needed. DWTs are simple and relatively efficient.

It didn't take. I like it and it works well. I like the DW version less. But, again, this is probably a toss up. If I was using DW exclusively I'd adapt. Let me add one thing in defense of my use of DWTs. DWTs are clearly intended for static sites. The critique of DWTs has to do with what happens when the page count rises.

A change to the DWT means that every page attached to the template also gets changed and that means every page must then be uploaded. If the site is big, three or four hundred pages, upload times could be annoyingly long. I helped a client with that sort of site and she did not want to use a DWT for just that reason, even though it would have helped in other respects.

The annoyance of uploading only occurs, and this is the key point, when the template contains content that constantly changes, such as marketing material in a sidebar. My templates do not contain that sort of content. When it is necessary, they have PHP includes that load the content.

Thus I only change a site's DWT when a client asks me to make a structural or design change to their site, not a regular occurrence. In addition, even for rich sites the page count is low because a single page can handle multiple functions. Very rarely do sites get near pages; the average is something like Even when I must modify the template, the impact is modest.

EW is free. Of course, it's no longer supported, won't get any bugs fixed, and won't get any better. Nonetheless, EW is free. Did I mention that EW is free? Dreamweaver is now part of Adobe's Creative Cloud subscription service. In short, DW is expensive. Too expensive, as far as I'm concerned. But and it's a big but I write PHP. EW is okay with PHP, not great.

I need great. Expression Web supports modern standards, especially Web 2. Dreamweaver is costly and may not be in the budget range of the casual user. Its user interface is cluttered and unless the developer is familiar with the software, it will be a hectic task to move around looking for certain features.

Expression Web is highly recommended for those who code in ASP. Limited support is provided for PHP, and Photoshop and Fireworks elements cannot be integrated as easily as with Dreamweaver. Since there is no support for using Expression Web on a Mac, it still has to go a long way. There is no support for older versions of HTML and JavaScript, therefore legacy tags are not supported by the built-in features like auto complete. NET and use Visual Studio.

Expression Web still has a long way to go in supporting open source technologies like PHP, and the software is still in its infancy when compared to Dreamweaver. Page content.